The Constitution of The United States was drafted by men of Enlightenment, many of whom were non-believers or paid lip-service to religion. As a result, the document itself is secular in its nature. This is an indisputable fact. When Benjamin Franklin suggested during the Constitutional Convention
that the founders begin each day of their labors with a prayer to God
for guidance, his suggestion was defeated.
The Founding Fathers wisely declared that Church and State should be completely separate (implied from the First Amendment) and even that the office of President need not be held by any person of any particular faith. This is hard to believe these days, where we see the huge political power of the religious right in the U.S. and a statement by any political condicate for any office that he or she is an atheist condemns them to abject failure. Almost all 535 members of Congress declare themselves Christians. This is a statistical impossibility.
The Christian right have hijacked the United States by stealth. Sections of the Tea Party even want schoolchildren to be taught that the Constitution was created by the hand of God. I kid you not. The phrase "One Nation Under God" wasn't adopted by Congress until 1942 in the Pledge of Allegiance and wasn't included on currency until the 1950's. It was never used in the Constitution.
So was it any surprise that a group of Churchmen of the right-leaning persuasion recently publicly admitted crossing the line and brazenly included politics in their sermons? Of course not. These people think it's really OK to do this. Have they ever read the Constitution or understood its origins? These are people who benefit from tax-exempt status purely because they keep their meddling hands off politics and do good deeds in the community. Their sermons must sound like a rallying cry for the Republican Party (I'm tempted to add "for God's sake"), and in my opinion they should be prosecuted by the IRS or at least have their status reviewed.
Of course, people of faith have an interest in politics. Why shouldn't they? But it's a sad day when they go to Church on Sunday and hear a sermon that has all the hallmarks of a political rally. However, it's encouraging to hear that voters are getting wise tothis nonsense and almost 50% believe their leaders talk too much about religion and their personal beliefs, with a huge 66% saying that a church should never endorse a political candidate.
We can only hope this trend will continue and the Church keeps its hands off politics in future.
A lawyer's view on all things relevant to expert witnesses in the U.S [Our U.K Expert Witness Blog is at xprouk.blogspot.com]. Guest expert witness bloggers contribute too so that readers - legal professionals or otherwise - can gain some insights into the invaluable work they do. You can also visit the website at: www.xprolegal.com where you can view hundreds of expert witness profiles.
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
Wednesday, 26 September 2012
The Outrage of Sharia Marriages
The Sunday Times in London carried out an undercover investigation recently on
the disgraceful forced marriages of children to adult Muslim men in the
U.K. I shouldn't have been shocked but I was....and I'm furious. Unfortunately, I expect the situation is much the same in the U.S.
The report stated that girls as young as twelve were being married off to grown men. This is done with the complicity of parents and Muslim clerics - and we as a society it seems aren't prepared to say enough is enough for the fear of offending those who follow the religion of permanent offence.
If there are 'moderate Muslims' where are they? Why aren't they trying to stop this openly supported trade in paedophilia? Do they too shy away from causing offence to the all-powerful clergy? If that's right, well shame on them.
These people should be told that if they wish to practice barbaric customs from their 'holy book' then they are not only breaking the law of this country but if they continue they will be prosecuted to the full extent of it. Successive governments, however, have pandered to the whims of these people. Even some U.K judges have welcomed the fact that some pockets of society are ruled not by the law of the land where they are situated but by the violent and Stone Age edicts of Sharia.
This has to stop.
I have lived in foreign countries over the years and I accepted the law of the land. I accepted other peoples' ways even if I sometimes disagreed with them. I have never been racist and never will be. I despise it. But we cannot ignore the creeping danger of allowing an alien culture to get a foothold in our home - a place it most certainly does not belong and isn't wanted. If Muslims, or anyone else for that matter, wish to practice their faith then by all means do so (despite the fact that those of other faiths aren't tolerated at all in many Muslim countries). But obey our laws or face the consequences.
This is the message that our mainstream politicians should be sending, but will never do so for fear of 'offending' Islam.
The report stated that girls as young as twelve were being married off to grown men. This is done with the complicity of parents and Muslim clerics - and we as a society it seems aren't prepared to say enough is enough for the fear of offending those who follow the religion of permanent offence.
If there are 'moderate Muslims' where are they? Why aren't they trying to stop this openly supported trade in paedophilia? Do they too shy away from causing offence to the all-powerful clergy? If that's right, well shame on them.
These people should be told that if they wish to practice barbaric customs from their 'holy book' then they are not only breaking the law of this country but if they continue they will be prosecuted to the full extent of it. Successive governments, however, have pandered to the whims of these people. Even some U.K judges have welcomed the fact that some pockets of society are ruled not by the law of the land where they are situated but by the violent and Stone Age edicts of Sharia.
This has to stop.
I have lived in foreign countries over the years and I accepted the law of the land. I accepted other peoples' ways even if I sometimes disagreed with them. I have never been racist and never will be. I despise it. But we cannot ignore the creeping danger of allowing an alien culture to get a foothold in our home - a place it most certainly does not belong and isn't wanted. If Muslims, or anyone else for that matter, wish to practice their faith then by all means do so (despite the fact that those of other faiths aren't tolerated at all in many Muslim countries). But obey our laws or face the consequences.
This is the message that our mainstream politicians should be sending, but will never do so for fear of 'offending' Islam.
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
Article: Reinsurance - The Invisible Insurers
With thanks to insurance consultant and expert witness John T. Bogart for his article: Reinsurance - The Invisible Insurers. You can view the full article here.
Mr Bogart's full profile with X-Pro is here.
Mr Bogart's full profile with X-Pro is here.
Thursday, 13 September 2012
Drug Decriminalization: A Federal Judge Speaks
Respected federal judge Richard A. Posner, who's
considered a legal conservative as called for the elimination of criminal laws
against drugs in a lecture at Illinois' Elmhurst college. The Judge was, of course free to speak out did so by cogently setting out the argument for decriminalization, but I seriously doubt that any politician seeking election by the public would follow suit.It's a bit like religion - at election time everyone's a Christian.
Here's an extract:
"I don't think we should have a fraction of the drug laws that we
have. I think it's really absurd to be criminalizing possession or use or
distribution of marijuana," he said. "I can't see any difference
between that and cigarettes." The audience gave him a round of applause.
..."But also I'm skeptical about the other drug
laws," Judge Posner added. "The notion of using the criminal law as
the primary means of dealing with a problem of addiction, of misuse, of ingesting
dangerous drugs -- I don't think that's sensible at all."
He said drug laws are "responsible for a high
percentage of our prisoners. And these punishments are often very, very severe.
It's all very expensive." Judge Posner has pointed out that legalizing
marijuana and other drugs would save federal, state and local governments $41.3
billion per year.
He said drug laws are, "...a waste of a lot of
high quality legal minds, and it's also a waste of people's lives who could be
as least moderately productive with having to spend year after year in prison.
That is a serious problem."
The full video is here.
Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Expert Profile...
Expert Witness Profile: Dr Allan Rubenstein,
MD. Child & Adult Neurology.
Clinical Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, NYU Langone Medical
Center. Actively practicing neurologist with strong academic
credentials, numerous publications, several books, available for record
review, IME’s for all personal injury litigation, including medical
malpractice. Approximately 50 depositions, 25 court testimony, 50/50
plaintiff/defense ratio. Midtown Manhattan location, available to
travel.
Areas of specialty include genetic and developmental problems of the CNS (HIE, birth trauma ), post-traumatic mild cognitive deficit, cervical and lumbosacral trauma, cerebrovacular disorders, neuromuscular disorders, Lyme disease, neurologic complications of anesthesia, neuro-oncology Contact: ARubenstein@CNS-PC.com or call 212-974-3009 for references, further information, CV and rates.
Areas of specialty include genetic and developmental problems of the CNS (HIE, birth trauma ), post-traumatic mild cognitive deficit, cervical and lumbosacral trauma, cerebrovacular disorders, neuromuscular disorders, Lyme disease, neurologic complications of anesthesia, neuro-oncology Contact: ARubenstein@CNS-PC.com or call 212-974-3009 for references, further information, CV and rates.
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
Article: The Work of Physician Assistants
With thanks to PA, expert witness and X-Pro member Dr Jeffrey Nicholson. His article on the invaluable medical-legal work conducted by PAs was republished by us and can be viewed here.
Andy
The X-Pro Legal Team
Andy
The X-Pro Legal Team
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
Nobody Asked Me But.....
U.S
Expert Witness Blog: Hotel expert and X-Pro Legal Member Stan Turkel, Aug.3rd 2012:
1. Better Than Expected
HotelNewsNow.com reported on July 26, 2012:
Despite a softening
economy, the outlook for future monthly overall business conditions in
the U.S.
hotel industry increased during June, according to e-forecasting.com's
Hotel
Industry Leading indicator. The
indicator increased 0.5% to 103.5 during June, following an increase of
0.6%
during May. It was set to equal 100 in
2005.
HIL's six-month growth rate, which historically has confirmed the forthcoming turning points in U.S. hotel business activity, was 4.1% in June, following a positive rate of 3.6% in May.
The probability of the hotel industry entering into recession in the near-term registered 0.8% in June, down from 0.9% reported in May.
HIL's six-month growth rate, which historically has confirmed the forthcoming turning points in U.S. hotel business activity, was 4.1% in June, following a positive rate of 3.6% in May.
The probability of the hotel industry entering into recession in the near-term registered 0.8% in June, down from 0.9% reported in May.
Given the dire predictions of economic doom by certain political analysts, the report above forecasts a better future for the U.S. hotel industry.
2. More New Hotel Brands
In addition to the 115 new hotel brands made public in the past 28 months, the following were recently announced:
- Commune Hotels by Thompson Hotels
- Ahn Luh by Beijing Tourism Group and GHM
- The Refinery
- Ambience Hotels by Kempinski
- Swiss-Belinn Pangkalan Bun by Swiss-Belhotel International
- ME by Melia London
- SLS Hotels by sbe
3. Hotel Room Cleanliness
Following inauguration of Best
Western International's "I Care Clean" program, recent research from
Europe reported that almost 70% of hotel guests say that cleanliness
and
hygiene are most important. The research
completed across Europe by Hotelschool in The Hague in conjunction with
Sealed
Air's Diversey business shows that most people now make their decisions
on
where to stay using online ratings to tell their friends if they
encounter poor
conditions. The cleanliness and appearance of bedrooms and bathrooms were the most critical areas for guests when forming their opinions.
"This research confirms our understanding of the critical areas to keep clean and the specific tasks that are vital to making that all-important first impression to guests," said Lill Kleven, global hospitality sector marketing lead for Sealed Air's Diversey business.
In addition, the research compiled of responses from almost 700 people in five major EU countries, asked guests about which aspects of cleanliness they expected the hotel to always get right in bedrooms and bathrooms.
In bedrooms, the three most important factors were clean linen, no evidence of previous guests and absence of bad smells or odors. In bathrooms, over three quarters said cleanliness of the toilet seat and pan was a factor and almost half said it was the most important.
In total, 46% said review sites were the most important source of information when choosing a hotel and a further 28% cited personal recommendations as the biggest influence.
Two-thirds of the respondents stated that they had stayed in a hotel that was not clean, while 82% had told family and friends about their experience, 75% were put off returning and 72% recommended family and friends should not stay there.
The full research has enabled Hotel School The Hague and Sealed Air's Diversey business to make evidence-based recommendations to hotels that help increase guest satisfaction, retention and guest recommendations.
In addition, the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 North American Hotel Guest Satisfaction Index Study was released on July 25, 2012 and reported that overall hotel guest satisfaction declined seven index points. This is a new low since 2006. Room cleanliness, comfort of the bed, ease of adjusting the room temperature and guestroom smell among other factors are taken into account.
4. Lawsuit To Remove Hammons CEO Dowdy
One of the heroes in my book "Great American Hoteliers: Pioneers of the Hotel Industry" (AuthorHouse, 2009) is John Q. Hammons.
In 2006, I visited Springfield, Missouri where I interviewed Mr. Hammons (and his excellent executive team) and discovered that he had developed 185 hotel properties in 40 states. This master hotel developer, builder, owner and manager disdained standard feasibility studies when assessing potential sites for hotel development. Instead, he relied on his own experience, knowledge and intuition.
In 2010, Hammons was removed from the leadership of his company by Jacquie Dowdy, a long-time aide who assumed the CEO position. Hammons' seclusion ̶ long-time friends have reported being barred from visiting ̶ led to an investigation by the state to establish guardianship. Now the Atrium Holding Co, owners of more than half the hotels managed by John Q. Hammons, has filed a lawsuit claiming that CEO Dowdy violated a contract in 2010 when she appointed herself as leader and Gregory Groves as general counsel. The suit calls for an injunction preventing Dowdy from acting as CEO and removing Groves as general counsel. It also seeks an injunction to allow Atrium to appoint a president for JQH Hotels as well as damages related to Dowdy's salary and staff bonuses.
Let justice be done!
5. Hotel History: U.S. Grant
Hotel San Diego, California
The U.S. Grant Hotel was built by
U.S. Grant, Jr. in honor of his illustrious father, President Ulysses
S.
Grant. Grant bought the 100-room Horton
House Hotel and demolished it to construct the current hotel in 1910. It was designed by the famous architect
Harrison Albright, best known for the West Baden Springs Hotel (1902),
French
Lick, Indiana with the largest free-spanning dome in the world, then
known as
the "Eighth Wonder of the World." When it opened, the U.S. Grant Hotel featured top floor arcadia windows, balcony balustrades and imposing lentil cornices. Inside, a grand white marble staircase with a carved alabaster railing led from the lobby up to the hotel rooms.
In 1919, Baron
Long acquired an
interest in the hotel and for the next twenty years instituted the
following
improvements:
- converted the hotel's Bivouac Grill into a speakeasy during Prohibition, named the Plata Real nightclub with live music and dancing and illegal beverages
- created the Italianate Ballroom on the lower level with a travertine marble floor and a unique hand-painted ceiling (now the Crystal Ballroom)
- installed the tallest radio towers on the West Coast on the hotel's roof which became the home offices for radio station KFVW. President Franklin Roosevelt delivered one of his first radio speeches to the country from this radio station
The hotel was extensively refurbished in the 1980s by the New York-based Sybedon Corporation and Christopher Sickels but fell on hard times due to a subsequent nationwide financial slump. Sybedon also acquired and restored the historic Jefferson Hotel (Richmond, Va.), the Jung Hotel (New Orleans, La.) and the Montauk Manor (Montauk N.Y.)
At about the same time that the hotel renovation project was underway, a 26-square block shopping mall ̶ the uniquely-designed Horton Plaza ̶ opened across the street from the Grant Hotel. Along with the massive restoration of the Gaslamp Quarter and the relocation of the San Diego Convention Center to Harbor Drive, these major projects transformed the area.
In 2003, the hotel was purchased by the very ancestors of the land on which she stood. The Sycuan Tribal Development Corporation (STDC), the business arm of Sycuan, a sovereign tribe of the Kumeyaay Nation, acquired the 11-story hotel for $45 million.
The Kumeyaay Indians are one of four Native American tribes that are indigenous to San Diego County. The Kumeyaay can trace their San Diego roots back more than 10,000 years. Their people lived from the northern edges of San Diego and south past the Mexican border, with land that includes the very spot where the U.S. Grant now stands.
President Ulysses S. Grant, the 18th President of the United States, disapproved the treatment of the Indians of the American West. In 1875, he passed an executive order setting aside 640 acres of land in Dehasa Valley in East San Diego County for the Kumeyaay Tribes. In great part due to his efforts, the United States Government in 1891 passed the "Act for the Relief of the Mission Indians" which officially recognized the sovereign status of California's Indian Tribes.
The Kumeyaay, who had suffered so enormously at the hands of generations of Westerners, remember Ulysses S. Grant as a rare soul among politicians ̶ forthright and generous, he gave them what so many before attempted to take away: dignity, in the form of land. In an act of poetic justice, the extraordinary restoration of the U.S. Grant Hotel pays respect to its history and to the heritage of the Kumeyaay Nation.
6. Quote of the Month
"The young man
knows the
rules, but the old man knows the exceptions"
Oliver
Wendell Holmes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
